Job Descriptions Suck - They Cause Your Mis-Hires
Mis-Hires Job Descriptions Hiring Methods Jun 14, 2016 12:00:00 AM Topgrading Team %
Job Descriptions are often so vague that they lead to preventable mis-hires; Job Scorecards, with measurable accountabilities for everything including competencies, prevent costly mis-hires. Exit interviews have for decades resulted in a common myth: companies conclude that the low performers they fired are just making excuses when they say their failing was because, “They never really told me what the job was.” Sounds like sour grapes but oftentimes their “excuse” is valid.
Picture a VP of Sales whose job description was to boost domestic, international, and new product sales. A sharp “doer” with a record of boosting sales, he confidently took the job. A year later the CEO of that company hired me to coach the VP, because everyone on the top team considered him a failure.
Coaching was his last chance to keep his job. I interviewed him, then asked for opinions of his boss (the CEO), peers, and direct reports. My first conclusion was – the job description did NOT accurately portray what he’d be held accountable for. If he had known, he and any sane candidate would NOT have taken the job. So … let me be blunt: JOB DESCRIPTIONS SUCK: 99% of job descriptions are too vague. Most members of the team had very different views:
- The VP of Finance wanted profitable sales.
- The VP of Marketing wanted her new products sold (profits could come later), because with patents running out her job depended on new products.
- The VP of Operations wanted his domestic plants filled, fearing a focus on international would force him to close domestic plants that then would be less productive.
- The CEO wanted the head of sales to do all of the above.
